Anchor Estates, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOCK, Judge.
These two consolidated inverse condemnation cases are before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the Court’s order to compel discovery and for failure to prosecute. For the reasons discussed herein, defendant’s motion is granted and the two cases are to be dismissed.
Background
On April 13, 1981, plaintiffs filed a complaint in the United States Court of Claims seeking just compensation for the alleged taking of their land by the United States. *579Plaintiffs claim that their land was taken by inverse condemnation as a result of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kadin Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Robert J. Wright v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Lemelson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
- Griffin & Dickson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Anchor Estates, Inc. And Dakotaville, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987