Legal Opinion

Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. Barclay

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1935No. 6213PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.

Plaintiff, Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District, filed its petition in this court, praying for a writ of prohibition directed to Honorable Adam B. Barclay, presiding Judge of the Third Judicial District for Ada County, for the purpose of arresting further proceedings under an order made and entered by him in September, 1934, requiring plaintiff to serve and bring in as parties defendant all the water users of Drainage District No. 4 of Ada County. The petition is predicated on the contention that the order made, upon which the court purposes to proceed, is in excess of and without the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Farmers' Co-Operative Ditch Co. v. Riverside Irrigation District, Ltd.Idaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Big Wood Canal Co. v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Spivey v. District Court of Third Judicial DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Weiser Irrigation District v. Middle Valley Irrigating Ditch Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Yaden v. Gem Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Almo Water Company v. DarringtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. HallIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bradshaw v. Milner Low Lift Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Nelson v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API