State v. Hall
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Justice.
From a judgment of conviction in the Probate Court appellant appealed to the District Court where a trial de novo was had before a six-man jury. The instructions to the jury included the charging part of the complaint and the portion of I.C. § 18-4309 which reads:
“Every person who shall wilfully waste water for irrigation, or who shall wilfully open, close, change or disturb, or interfere with, any headgate or water box or valve measuring or regulating device, without authority, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. * * * ”
On March 25, 1963, one Ray Blair filed a complaint in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Murrill v. State Board of AccountancyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Big Wood Canal Co. v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
- Archbold v. HuntingtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Meyer v. Skyline Mobile HomesIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- DeRousse v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- Robey v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. LeferinkIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HahnIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.