Yaden v. Gem Irrigation District
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBitdge, C. J.
— This action was brought to obtain a writ of mandate to compel respondent to deliver water to appellant’s land and to recover damages for loss of crops as a result of respondent’s failure and refusal so to do. The cause was tried to the- court and judgment was entered in favor of respondent from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted.
Throughout this opinion the use of the word “appellant” will be taken as referring to Eleanor B. Yaden.
The facts are substantially as follows: Respondent district was organized in 1909. Its irrigation works consist of *304a pumping plant on Snake River, from which…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Jenison v. RedfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Niday v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Gerber v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
- Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. BriggsIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Abbott v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- MacLay v. Missoula Irrigation DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1931
- Lewiston Orchards Irrigation District v. GilmoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Stephenson v. Pioneer Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Jones v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.