Legal Opinion

Big Wood Canal Co. v. Chapman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1927No. 4750PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARTSON, Commissioner.

On August 21, 1907, the Idaho Irrigation Company, Ltd., respondent’s predecessor in interest, contracted with the state of Idaho to build, under the Carey Act (43 U. S. C. A., sec. 641), and acts amendatory and supplemental thereto, irrigation works for the reclamation of lands in Blaine, Gooding and Lincoln counties. On January 2, 1909, the parties entered into a supplemental contract, to cover additional lands proposed to be reclaimed. In anticipation of such contracts, the said construction company acquired by assignment from the original permittees water permit No.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hart v. BostwickSupreme Court of Florida · 1872
  2. Speer v. StephensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. ShermanWyoming Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Bentinck v. FranklieTexas Supreme Court · 1873
  5. State v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1911

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Newland v. ChildIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  3. DeRousse v. HigginsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Glenn Dale Ranches, Inc. v. ShaubIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Graham v. LeekIdaho Supreme Court · 1943

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API