Legal Opinion

Spivey v. District Court of Third Judicial District

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1923PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MCCARTHY, j.

— This is an original application for a writ of prohibition. The following facts are stipulated. March 24, 1923, the defendant judge addressed to counsel and delivered to the clerk for the purpose of making a minute entry a letter which closed as follows:

“I am in doubt as to the grounds set up in motion for new trial, as being sufficient to grant the same, and therefore will have to deny the motion upon those grounds.”

The same day the clerk entered the following on the minutes:

“In this cause, the intervenors motion for a new trial having been heretofore argued before the court and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Carpenter v. Superior Court of San Joaquin Cty.California Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Coombs v. Hibberd.California Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Olden v. PaxtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Allen v. VojeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Watson v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. First Nat. Bank of Pocatello v. PolingIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Clark v. Ada County Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Hamilton v. RybarIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. LindemanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API