Legal Opinion

Almo Water Company v. Darrington

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1972No. 10748PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Chief Justice.

The issues in this unusual water rights case require the application of law to complex facts, pieced together from a record that is a thicket of obscurities and apparent contradictions. The foundation of our analysis is a comprehensive statement of the facts as we perceive them.

I

Water District 8-E is located in an arid region of the state where farming and ranching depend on irrigation from mountain streams during the summer run-off. Rights to the water in Almo Creek and Edwards Creek, portrayed on the following map, were established in 1928 by a federal district court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hall v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Carrington v. CrandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Big Wood Canal Co. v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Basinger v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. WalmstadIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Canyon View Irrigation Co. v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Jenkins v. State, Dept. of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  4. McCray v. RosenkranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Sears v. BerrymanIdaho Supreme Court · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API