Legal Opinion

Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1929No. Docket No. 5246PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNELL, J., pro tem.

November 15, 1923, appellants • signed the document set forth below and handed it, together with the $2,500 mentioned therein as a deposit, to respondent Evans-Ferguson Corporation (as agent for respondent California Trust Company), which thereupon executed an acceptance of the offer contained therein. The document in question reads as follows:

"W ilshir e-Fair fax Tract.

Evans-Ferguson Corporation Sole Agents

508-9-10 California Bank Building Phones: 821-507 Metropolitan 2372 Los Angeles, California.

W. H. Elwell Tract Manager Office at

Wilshire Blvd. & Fairfax Ave. Phones:…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Lapp-Gifford Co. v. Muscoy Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Central Oil Co. v. Southern Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1908

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Collins v. Vickter Manor, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Naify v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API