Legal Opinion

Central Oil Co. v. Southern Refining Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1908No. L.A. No. 2073PublishedCited by 28 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. G. A. Gibbs, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract whereby plaintiff agreed to deliver to defendant oil produced from plaintiff’s wells, as follows: “from sixty thousand (60,000) to one hundred eight thousand (108,000) barrels of forty-two (42) gallons each, to be delivered as ordered by second party (Southern Refining Company), within one year from the first day of July, 1904, provided that not less than five thousand (5,000) nor more than nine thousand (9,000) barrels shall be delivered in any month during the term of this contract. . . . This contract shall commence with the 1st day of July,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilcoxson v. StittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Dana v. St. Paul Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Horn Silver Mining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Westervelt v. HuiskampSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Sloan v. StearnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Asia Investment Co. v. LevinWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Garcia v. World Savings, FSBCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API