Naify v. Pacific Indemnity Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.
This is an action by the injured party and the insured to recover on a policy of automobile liability insurance. Upon a trial by the court, plaintiffs had judgment and defendants appealed.
On October 15, 1932, plaintiff Naify contracted to purchase an automobile from defendant Pacific Nash Motor Company. A conditional sale contract was executed with the understanding that the same was to be financed by and assigned to defendant Pacific Finance Corporation, and that said defendant would procure a policy of insurance with defendant Pacific Indemnity Company, covering the respective interests of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Levan v. Pottstown, Phœnixville Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- American Building Maintenance Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- B. & B. Trucking, Inc. v. Home Fire & Marine Insurance of CaliforniaNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.