Legal Opinion

Naify v. Pacific Indemnity Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1938No. Sac. 5165PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is an action by the injured party and the insured to recover on a policy of automobile liability insurance. Upon a trial by the court, plaintiffs had judgment and defendants appealed.

On October 15, 1932, plaintiff Naify contracted to purchase an automobile from defendant Pacific Nash Motor Company. A conditional sale contract was executed with the understanding that the same was to be financed by and assigned to defendant Pacific Finance Corporation, and that said defendant would procure a policy of insurance with defendant Pacific Indemnity Company, covering the respective interests of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Investment Co. v. Home Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Levan v. Pottstown, Phœnixville Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. American Building Maintenance Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  5. B. & B. Trucking, Inc. v. Home Fire & Marine Insurance of CaliforniaNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Van't Rood v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Michelson v. HamadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API