Andrews v. Wickenden
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This appeal was taken by the junior party from an adverse decision of the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarding to appellee, Wickenden, priority of invention of the subject matter defined by the count in issue, which reads as follows: “In a process for the conversion of an acid sludge resulting from treatment of a petroleum distillate with sulphuric acid into an active carbon, the improvement which comprises the step of distilling the acid sludge at a temperature below about 750°F., in combination with the step of using an atmosphere of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kropa v. RobieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In Re DraegerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Cryns v. MusherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
- In Re CresswellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- Application of FreyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- John D. Rieser v. William A. WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Carlo v. Bocciarelli v. Charles E. HuffmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Emerson v. BeachCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- Application of TankeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954
- General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jefferson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.