Legal Opinion
John D. Rieser v. William A. Williams
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided May 23, 1958No. Patent Appeal 6367PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’CONNELL, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office awarding priority of invention of the subject matter in issue in interference No. 86,-744 to the senior party, William A. Williams, the appellee here. The invention in issue is an adjustably mounted speed change unit defined in three counts. Count 1, which is typical, reads as follows:
“1. A speed change transmission comprising, a driven shaft, a journal support for said driven shaft, a prime mover and a speed change device operably coupled to form a speed change unit,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brown v. BartonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
- Chapman v. BeedeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
- Kendall v. SearlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- Jenks v. KnightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- Scharmann v. KasselCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Monsanto Company v. Mycogen Plant Science, Inc. And Agrigenetics, Inc., Defendants-Cross and Syngenta Seeds, Inc., Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Phillip W. Berman, Timothy J. Gregory, Laurence A. Lasky, Gerald R. Nakamura, Eric J. Patzer, John S. Patton, and Ellen S. Vitetta v. Gerard M. HouseyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Everlock Fastening Systems, Inc. v. Health Alliance Plan (In Re Everlock Fastening Systems, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
- Charles J. Stalego and Wendell W. Drummond v. Pierre Rene Heymes and Ivan PeychesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
- Warren W. Fitzgerald v. ArbibCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.