Legal Opinion

Application of Tanke

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 27, 1954No. Patent Appeal 6036PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O'CONNELL, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States .Patent Office; rendered thereby under Rule 206(b) of the Rules of Practice, 35 U.S.C.A. Appendix. The decision affirmed that of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 34 through 48 of appellants’ application filed July 15, 1947, for a patent on certain improvements in “Draft Means and Depth Control for Ground Working Implements,” such as a plow “detachably connected with, and op-eratively carried by, a tractor in trailing relation thereto.” Claim 32 was allowed.

The reference is:

Strandlund…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Engineering Development Laboratories v. Radio Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  3. In Re KaufmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  4. Chapman v. BeedeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
  5. Application of RipperCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  2. Corbett v. ChisholmCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  3. John D. Rieser v. William A. WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API