Legal Opinion

Application of Frey

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 9, 1950No. Patent Appeals 5679PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting all of the claims, 16 to 20, inclusive, of a patent application, serial No. 479,593, filed March 18, 1943, “For Lubricant.” The claims were rejected by the examiner on the ground of estoppel by reason of laches and also on the ground of not possessing sufficient basis in the disclosure of the application. The board reversed the decision of the examiner with respec-t to the second ground of rejection, but seemingly applied a new…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chapman v. BeedeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1924
  2. Conover v. DownsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  3. Cryns v. MusherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  4. Thompson v. HamiltonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  5. Jenks v. KnightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re SasseCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1980
  2. Andrews v. WickendenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
  3. Matter of the Application of Walter D. Teague, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  4. Regents of the University of California v. University of Iowa Research FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Matter of the Application of Walter D. Teague, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API