Legal Opinion

General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jefferson Chemical Co., Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 5, 1973No. 68 Civ. 1227PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

This action, brought on by plaintiff, General Tire & Rubber Co. (hereinafter called “General” or “plaintiff”), seeks judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 declaring certain claims in United States Patent #3,102,875, issued on September 3, 1963, to Herbert Heiss (hereinafter called “the Heiss patent”), now assigned to defendant, Jefferson Chemical Co. (hereinafter called “Jefferson” or “defendant”), invalid under 35 U.S.C. §§ 102(e), 102(g), 103 and 112. General alleges, in addition, that these claims are not the invention of Mr. Heiss; that they constitute late claims and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Monsanto Company v. Rohm & Haas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
  3. The Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  4. Fairchild Hiller Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Application of Guido H. Stempel, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Skil Corp. v. Lucerne Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
  2. The General Tire & Rubber Company v. Jefferson Chemical Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API