In Re Cresswell
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting, as un-patentable over prior art, claims 21 to 23,. inclusive, in appellant’s application for a patent relating to collagenous articles and' the method of making them. The claims, were further rejected as being indefinite.
The appeal was argued on May 11, 1950,. and on June 30, 1950, the court rendered its decision which reversed the holdings of the Patent Office. On August 16, 1950, the Solicitor for the Patent Office…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- McCarty v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- In re CusterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1949
- In Re CrowellCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
3Cited by10 opinions
- Andrews v. WickendenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952
- LAITRAM CORPORATION v. Deepsouth Packing Co.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1969
- In re McIntoshCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Davies-Young Soap Company v. Nu-Pro Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Application of Lee S. Twomey and Clarence J. SchillingCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.