Legal Opinion

Emerson v. Beach

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided September 15, 1954No. 6062PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLE, Judge.

Appealing from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences of the United States Patent Office, John F. Emerson, senior party in interference, hereinafter referred to as appellant, has assigned error by said board in its award of priority of the inventive subject matter contained in interference counts 1, 2, and 3 to the junior party, Lennox F. Beach, hereinafter referred to as appellee.

The interference was declared between Patent No. 2,476,273, issued to appellee on July 19, 1949, based on an application filed September 17, 1942 for “Apparatus Sensitive To Magnetic Fields,”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cryns v. MusherCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  2. Andrews v. WickendenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John D. Rieser v. William A. WilliamsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  2. Matter of the Application of Walter D. Teague, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  3. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Jefferson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  4. Matter of the Application of Walter D. Teague, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  5. Matter of the Application of Walter D. Teague, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API