In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Paauwe
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The accused was charged with violation of disciplinary rules of the Code of Professional Conduct in four respects arising out of his representation of certain clients regarding one legal matter. The matter comes before us in an unusual way. The Oregon State Bar and the accused have recommended to us that we adopt the opinion and recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board. Prior to examination of the record, we advised them that we would treat the matter as having been submitted on the record and would make our own findings of fact and conclusions of law.
The uncontested facts are that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cook v. MichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of LathenOregon Supreme Court · 1982
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CollierOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaauweOregon Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.