Chavez v. Scully
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The original action was one in partition. A final decree was entered therein and provided, among other things, that a certain amount should be allowed the parties as attorneys’ fees, and then proceeded to apportion said amount to the several attorneys in the case, among whom was Waldo M. York, one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs, who was given one-fourth of the aggregate amount allowed as counsel fees. After the entry of said final decree, two of the plaintiffs, discovering that an error had been committed therein, were dissatisfied with the decree and immediately took steps to have the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- In re Estate of LevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Sullivan v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Briggs v. BreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Collins v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1936
- Pennell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- City of Los Angeles v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Capuccio v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.