Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Levinson

California Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1895No. 15916PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J.V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

Appeal by certain legatees named in the will of John Levinson, deceased, from an order settling the account of J. W. Goodwin, administrator with the will annexed of the estate of said deceased. The administrator was charged with misconduct in the discharge of his trust, and was cited to show cause why his letters should not be revoked; thereupon, on February 14, 1893, he filed the account in question, and tendered his resignation of his office of administrator. The order appealed from declared the charges against respondent to be without foundation, allowed his account as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. In re the estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. In re RoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. In re Estate of OgierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. In re LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Isenberg v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Trumpler v. TrumplerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Garver v. ThomanArizona Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Collins v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  5. McKee v. SoherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API