Legal Opinion

Capuccio v. Caire

California Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 12342PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This is an appeal from certain orders or decrees granting the plaintiff’s motion for counsel fees, fixing the reasonable value of the fees at $75,000, apportioning the same between the parties to this partition action, and denying the appellant’s application for special findings.

The litigation out of which this appeal arises is of long standing, having received the attention and consideration of this court on several occasions. Its protracted character, and the effect upon this appeal of what has gone before, may best be illustrated by quoting from our most recent decision in the cause (207…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Rossi v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Capuccio v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Chavez v. ScullyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  5. Capuccio v. CaireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank & Union Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Lin v. JengCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. Randell v. RandellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Forrest v. ElamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Johnston v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API