Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. Knapp

California Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1936No. L. A. 15364PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This is an action in interpleader. Before trial the City of Los Angeles dismissed an eminent domain suit which it had brought to condemn land and water rights in Inyo County. Upon dismissal and abandonment of said suit by the city, the defendants therein became entitled to an award of costs and disbursements, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. (Sec. 1255a, Code Civ. Proc.) Accordingly, the court rendered judgment in favor of defendants Emmett Warnell Knapp and June Knapp and against the City of Los Angeles for $5,923 for costs, disbursements and attorneys’ fees. Of the total award, $4,200…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GroegerSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Gage v. AtwaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Wagner v. SariottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Vella v. HudginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Echlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API