Legal Opinion
Sharon v. Sharon
California Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1888No. 8984PublishedCited by 144 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order for alimony and counsel fees. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKinstry, J.
The appeals herein were taken in the lifetime of William Sharon, the original defendant. The first is from a judgment determining and declaring the validity of an alleged marriage of plaintiff and defendant, decreeing a divorce, and that plaintiff is entitled to one half of the community property. The second appeal is from an order directing the payment of counsel fees and alimony.
The court below found:—
“2. That on the twenty-fifth day of August, A. D. 1880, the plaintiff and defendant each signed a certain declaration of marriage, in the words and figures following, to wit:—,
“ ‘ In the city…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Markley v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Brinkley v. . BrinkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Jackson, ex rel. Dies v. WinneNew York Supreme Court · 1831
- Lessee of Sarah I. Jewell and Others, in Error v. Benjamin Jewell and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Ex Parte KoserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by144 opinions
- State v. FerrantoOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
- Flannery v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Millar v. MillarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.