Sullivan v. Gage
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs awarding a temporary writ of mandate against the defendants, the state board of examiners, commanding the board “to forthwith approve and allow” a claim of the plaintiffs against the state of California for five thousand dollars.
The facts material to this consideration are as follows: In 1888 an action was commenced by the people of the state of California, upon the relation of George A. Johnson, attorney-general, under section 803 of the Code of Civil Procedure,, against the American Sugar Refinery Company, a corporation, to obtain a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Havemeyer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Osterhoudt v. . RigneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Stuart v. BoulwareSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Millholen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Metropolitan Water Dist. v. MarquardtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Tirapelle v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.