Legal Opinion

Castelletto v. Bendon

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 13, 1961No. Civ. 24827PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISHOP, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiffs sought by this action to have it declared that three buildings, erected upon defendants’ lot, but which stand in part on plaintiffs’ property, were a continuing trespass and nuisance there, and should be removed. Among other defenses pleaded was the statute of limitations, subdivision 2 of section 338, Code of Civil Procedure, being specifically mentioned. We find that the statute of limitations pleaded precludes any judgment in plaintiffs’ favor, and are reversing, on defendants’ appeal, the judgment awarding plaintiffs a small sum in damages and providing for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kafka v. BozioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Rankin v. DebareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Troeger v. FinkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Bertram v. OrlandoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Tracy v. FerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Field-Escandon v. DeMannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Polin v. Chung ChoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Bailey v. OUTDOOR MEDIA GROUPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API