Legal Opinion
Bailey v. OUTDOOR MEDIA GROUP
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 25, 2007No. E040071PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McKINSTER, Acting P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff and appellant, Gary Bailey (Bailey), from the judgment entered on November 29, 2005, in his favor and against defendants and respondents, Outdoor Media Group (OMG), Jon M. Gunderson, and Lamar Advertising Company (Lamar), following a court trial on Bailey’s complaint for, among other things, damages based on trespass, wrongful occupation of land, and a common count for money had and received. The trial court awarded Bailey compensatory damages of $108,069 against OMG and Jon M. Gunderson, its principal, and an additional $86,131…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Kurinij v. Hanna & MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- C&C Properties, Inc. v. Shell Pipeline CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Graham v. BNSF Railway Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2013