Troeger v. Fink
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
Alleging an encroachment upon their unimproved property by one or the other, or both, of two commercial buildings which had been constructed respectively upon lots adjoining their property on opposite sides, plaintiffs sought damages, a mandatory injunction, and other equitable relief. Contrary to plaintiffs’ allegations, the trial court found that neither of the two buildings encroached, and, in addition, held that plaintiffs’ action was barred by limitations and laches. Plaintiffs have appealed from the judgment . . in so far as it is in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs. ...”
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Maguire v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Huth v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Kafka v. BozioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Lerner v. Los Angeles City Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Field-Escandon v. DeMannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Spar v. Pacific BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.