Bertram v. Orlando
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
Plaintiff and defendants are the owners of adjoining parcels of land. At least 20 years before the trial of this action defendants’ predecessors in interest placed upon their land three wooden buildings set upon concrete piers parts of which extend across the common boundary line and occupy a portion of the surface of plaintiff’s land. Plaintiff commenced an action for a mandatory injunction and damages and from a judgment granting plaintiff such relief defendants appeal. The primary question presented on appeal is whether the action falls within the statute of limitations, Code of Civil…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kafka v. BozioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Williams v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Rankin v. DebareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Robinson v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Pettit v. Incorporated Town of Grand JunctionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- 509 Sixth Avenue Corp. v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1964
- Palacios v. KlineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Spar v. Pacific BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- L'Enfant Plaza East, Inc. v. John McShain, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.