Legal Opinion

Polin v. Chung Cho

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1970No. Civ. 35344PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GUSTAFSON, J.

Plaintiffs (husband and wife) own a parcel of unimproved land in the City of San Luis Obispo. Defendants own an abutting parcel. Defendants erected what is known as the Southwood Shopping Center on their land.

Plaintiffs filed a complaint March 22, 1967, setting forth three causes of action against defendants. On March 6, 1969, defendants noticed a motion for summary judgment in favor of defendants as to each of the three causes of action. The motion was heard on declarations filed by the parties and was granted June 6, 1969. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgments entered…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Keys v. RomleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Kornoff v. Kingsburg Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Guntert v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Field-Escandon v. DeMannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. In Re Burbank Environmental LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
  4. County of Allegheny v. Merrit Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Farmy v. College Housing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API