Gray v. Durham Transfer and Storage, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Judge.
As can be seen from Finding No. 5 quoted above, the Industrial Commission found that plaintiff was not injured by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, because the only thing different or unusual about the incident to distinguish it from any other such lifting was the occurrence of pain.
It is plaintiff’s contention that this ruling is error. He contends that, where the injury itself is unexpected, it constitutes an injury by accident; and that no external, fortuitous occurrence is necessary. Plaintiff cites and relies upon Smith v. Creamery Co., 217 N.C.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Smith v. Cabarrus Creamery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Slade v. Willis Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Rhinehart v. Roberts Super Market, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Moore v. Engineering & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Russell v. Pharr Yarns, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- Beamon v. Stop and Shop GroceryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Southards v. Byrd Motor Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Hill v. Federal Express Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- Fowler v. Chaircraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.