Legal Opinion

Beamon v. Stop and Shop Grocery

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1975No. 7519IC651PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The findings of fact made by the Industrial Commission are supported by competent evidence. They are, therefore, conclusive on this appeal. Jackson v. Highway Commission, 272 N.C. 697, 158 S.E. 2d 865 (1968). The only question presented is whether the findings of fact support the Commission’s conclusion of law that plaintiff did not sustain an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of her employment within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

An injury to be compensable under our Workmen’s Compensation Act, G.S. 97-1 et seq., must result from an accident,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hensley v. Farmers Federation Co-OperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Jackson Ex Rel. Jackson v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Smith v. Cabarrus Creamery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Rhinehart v. Roberts Super Market, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Russell v. Pharr Yarns, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Searsey v. Perry M. Alexander Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Reams v. Burlington IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Dyer v. MacK Foster Poultry & Livestock, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Artis v. N. C. Baptist Hospitals Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Curtis v. Carolina Mechanical Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API