Legal Opinion

Hill v. Federal Express Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 2014No. COA 14-60PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

The Commission’s findings of fact were supported by competent evidence and its findings supported its conclusions of law. The Commission did not abuse its discretion in its determinations of the weight and credibility of the evidence, and did not employ an overly narrow interpretation of the Workers Compensation Act in weighing the evidence.

I. Factual and Procedural History

Jimmy Hill (plaintiff) was bom in 1953 and was 59 at the time of the hearing in this case. In December 2011 plaintiff had been employed as a courier for Federal Express Corporation (defendant) for over 13…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Adams v. AVX Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  2. Deese v. Champion International Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Gallimore v. Marilyn's ShoesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Clark v. Wal-MartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. N.C. Dep't of Pub. SafetyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. Lovelace v. B & R Auto Serv., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API