Legal Opinion
Day v. Taylor
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 24, 2006No. 05 Civ. 3659(VM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Pro se petitioner Roy Day (“Day”) seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Day was convicted in New York State Supreme Court, New York County, of third-degree criminal sale of a controlled substance, N.Y. Penal Law § 220.39(1), and third- and fourth-degree criminal possession of a controlled substance, N.Y. Penal Law §§ 220.16(1), 220.09(1). In his petition, Day raises three Fourteenth Amendment grounds for the writ: first, that his right to due process was violated when expert testimony was introduced to explain…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Siao-Pao v. ConnollyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Felder v. GoordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Rustici v. PhilipsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Quail v. FarrellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Durden v. GreeneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007