Legal Opinion
Quail v. Farrell
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 25, 2008No. 07 Civ. 6050 (VM)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
Pro se petitioner Charles Quail (“Quail”), seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2254. Quail raises six claims in his petition: (1) a violation of due process resulting from prosecutorial misconduct during his trial; (2) ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failure to preserve the issue of prosecutorial misconduct for appeal; (3) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for failing to raise issues that Quail specifically requested; (4) ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for failing to include certain issues in…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Edwards v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Gonzalez v. CunninghamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Andre Hudson v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2026
- Del Valle v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Fountain v. RacetteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.