Legal Opinion

Murray v. Carrier

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 26, 1986No. 84-1554PublishedCited by 7,161 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

We granted certoriari in this case to consider whether a federal habeas petitioner can show cause for a procedural default by establishing that competent defense counsel inad*482vertently failed to raise the substantive claim of error rather than deliberately withholding it for tactical reasons.

I

Respondent Clifford Carrier was convicted of rape and abduction by a Virginia jury in 1977. Before trial, respondent’s court-appointed counsel moved for discovery of the victim’s statements to police describing “her assailants, the vehicle the assailants were driving, and the location of where the alleged…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7,161 opinions

  1. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999

7,156 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API