Legal Opinion

Weaver v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1905No. S.F. No. 3351PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Franklin K. Lane, former City Attorney, Percy V. Long, City Attorney, and John P. Coghlan, Assistant City Attorney, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.

This appeal is taken by the defendant, the city and county of San Francisco, from a judgment rendered against defendant in favor of the plaintiff upon the pleadings." The record consists of the amended complaint, demurrer to the same, order overruling the demurrer, answer on the part of the defendant, notice of motion to take judgment upon the pleadings, and the so-called findings and the judgment entered in accordance with the motion, and notice of the appeal.

The complaint counts upon a former judgment rendered in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco April 24, 1896,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weaver v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Wallace v. EldredgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Argenti v. SawyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Chafoin v. RichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Colvig v. RKO General, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Taylor v. GeorgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API