Legal Opinion
English v. Olympic Auditorium, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1935No. Civ. 5432PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The plaintiffs have appealed from a portion of the judgment in these consolidated mechanics’ lien actions, which was rendered pursuant to the directions of the Supreme Court upon reversal of the former judgment therein. (English v. Olympic Auditorium, Inc., 217 Cal. 631, 644 [20 Pac. (2d) 946, 87 A. L. R. 1281].) It is asserted the trial court has added to its final judgment conditions which are not authorized by the specific directions of the Supreme Court, rendering them ineffectual and void.
Twenty suits for foreclosure of mechanics’ liens were filed in Los Angeles County against the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rogers v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- English v. Olympic Auditorium, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1933
- Lial v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Weaver v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Puritan Leasing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Carter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.