Legal Opinion
Pima County v. Palos Companies Unlimited
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 10, 1984No. 2 CA-CIV 4987PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This is an eminent domain case involving the construction of a drainage ditch. The determinative issue is whether appellees proved severance damages. We hold that they did not.
The subject property is flat, undeveloped desert land consisting of 78 acres (parcel 6G) and a private road (parcel 8A) which led south from the property to the Irving-ton Road alignment. The property was zoned for a trailer park but its location in the 100-year flood plain inhibited its full development since it was subject to flooding at depths of up to two feet during heavy rains.
The Irvington…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pima County v. BilbyArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Pima County v. De ConciniArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Hayward Building Materials Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- State Ex Rel. Herman v. Southern Pacific Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage Disrict v. GoehringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dixon v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Pima County v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- De Alfy Properties v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Calmat of Arizona v. STATE EX REL., MILLERCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Dixon v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992