De Alfy Properties v. Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DRUKE, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants De Alfy Properties and Richard Kay appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to Pima County in this inverse condemnation action. Because the parties agree the material facts are undisputed, we review the grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether the trial court applied the law correctly. See Gonzalez v. Satrustegui, 178 Ariz. 92, 870 P.2d 1188 (App.1993); United Bank of Arizona v. Allyn, 167 Ariz. 191, 805 P.2d 1012 (App.1990). We affirm.
¶ 2 In 1981, when Kay was the sole owner of the property in question, the Pima County…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. ThelbergArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. ToweryArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Sato v. Van DenburghArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Gonzalez v. SatrusteguiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hall v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Department of Forests, Parks & Recreation v. Town of Ludlow Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- C & G, Inc. v. Canyon Highway District No. 4Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- C & G, Inc. v. Canyon Highway District No. 4Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.