Legal Opinion

Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage Disrict v. Goehring

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1970No. Civ. 12183PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

REGAN, J.

The defendants are owners of a 140-acre parcel of land in San Joaquin County. Plaintiff district sought to condemn interests in three parcels of this land for a flood control project on Bear Creek. No part of the newly constructed flood control channel is upon defendants’ land. The district condemned (among other parcels of land) parcels 3097 and 3106B for a temporary easement as an access road for project construction, and an interest in parcel 3106C for a temporary easement (this parcel is in issue as it affects possible severance damages).

The jury rendered a verdict which…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. CanolaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. Fowler Irrevocable Trust 1992-1 v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  3. Rupert v. City of Rapid CitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. City of Los Angeles v. RicardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Mammoth Lakes Land Acquisition, LLC v. Town of Mammoth LakesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API