Legal Opinion
Dixon v. City of Phoenix
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 16, 1992No. 1 CA-CV 90-245Published
1Opinion of the Court
173 Ariz. 612 (1992)
845 P.2d 1107
Jimmie D. DIXON and Carolyn B. Dixon, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation; and Aztec Construction Company, a corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 1 CA-CV 90-245.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.
June 16, 1992.
Reconsideration Denied September 2, 1992.
Review Denied March 2, 1993.
Meyer, Vucichevich & Cimala by Henry G. Hester, Phoenix, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Roderick G. McDougall, City Atty. by Kent T. Reinhold, Asst. City Atty., Phoenix, for defendant-appellee City of Phoenix.
Robbins & Green,…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Hadley v. Southwest Properties, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Thatcher v. Lane Construction Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.