Legal Opinion

Pima County v. De Concini

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1955No. 6027PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINDES, Justice.

The appellees, plaintiffs below, are owners of a tract of land lying along the south border of a highway laid out by the appellant, Pima County, Arizona. On October 15, 1951, the board of supervisors ordered that the highway be widened in such a manner that it necessitated taking a 35-foot strip of plaintiffs’ land for a distance of approximately 2640 feet constituting about two acres. Plaintiffs appeared at the meeting of the board of supervisors at the time the foregoing order was issued and advised the board that the value of the land to be taken was $2,500 but that if the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Milam County v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Currie v. Glasscock CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Kersey v. Sch. River E. S. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1890
  4. Kansas City v. MortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Metcalf v. Mayor of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. Hayes EstateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  2. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. Jay Six Cattle Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Kreisman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. City of Phoenix v. Consolidated Water CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. Herman v. Southern Pacific Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API