Stratmore v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
William K. Coblentz and Jacobs, Sills & Coblentz for Petitioner.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
Robert D. Stratmore, admitted to practice in 1972, was ordered to show cause why our order admitting him to practice should not be revoked for the commission of acts involving moral turpitude before his admission to practice. It was charged in particular, inter alia, that in 1971 he knowingly made false representations regarding his expenses to 11 New York law firms with the intent to deceive the firms and thereby obtained money to which he was not entitled. 'Following evidentiary hearings both the local committee and Board of Governors of the State Bar (hereafter called the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re LavineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Petersen v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re WongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Hustedt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re SchneiderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Ramirez v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.