Legal Opinion

In re Wong

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 2000PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent, Raymond H. Wong, was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on May 2, 1988. He was also admitted to practice as an attorney in New Jersey on December 21, 1989. At all times relevant to this proceeding, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department, as well as in New Jersey.

The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) seeks an order for reciprocal discipline, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.3, publicly censuring respondent predicated upon the fact that he was similarly…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Norfolk & Portsmouth Bar Ass'n v. DrewrySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  4. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. ZdrokSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Stratmore v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by170 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Eric M. Berman, P.C. v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
  3. In re BikmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re LeverAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. In re BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API