Hustedt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BIRD, C. J.
Does the separation of powers doctrine preclude the Legislature from granting to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) the power to discipline an attorney by temporarily or permanently prohibiting him or her from practicing before the Board? Does the Board have authority to proceed with the contempt action it instituted against petitioner?
I
Petitioner, Edward F. Hustedt, was admitted to the practice of law in this state on January 5, 1966.
In 1978, Hustedt was retained to represent a defendant employer in a compensation case pending before the Board. On or about…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- LeVesque v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Howard v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Kasler v. LockyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.