Legal Opinion
Ramirez v. State Bar
California Supreme Court
Decided November 10, 1980No. S.F. 24117PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.
Review of recommendation of the State Bar Disciplinary Board that petitioner, Glenn D. Ramirez, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year, that execution of the order for such suspension be stayed, and that petitioner be placed on probation for the period of one year on conditions including actual suspension for one month.
The disciplinary board found petitioner had violated his oath and duties as an attorney (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6067, 6068, subds. (b), (d), and (f)) by “falsely maligning" justices of the Third District Court of Appeal. This finding is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrison v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Segretti v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Central District of California v. Stephen YagmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Hustedt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Matter of WestfallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Iowa Supreme Court Board of Professional Ethics & Conduct v. RonwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- In re CobbMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.