In Re Montgomery
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
A writ of habeas corpus was issued from this court directed to the chief of police of the city of Los Angeles, by whom petitioner was imprisoned by virtue of a warrant issued out of the police court, of that city. Petitioner was charged with misdemeanor in that he did “erect, establish, maintain and carry on a lumber-yard at No. 132 West Avenue 61 within the residence district of said city” of Los Angeles. The sole question presented therefore is the sufficiency .of ordinance No. 22,798 (New Series) of the city of Los Angeles in its application to petitioner. The contention is, 1. That the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Ex Parte Quong WoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Ex parte LaceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Grumbach v. LelandeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Ex Parte HadacheckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Brown v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Abbey Land & Improvement Co. v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.