Abbey Land & Improvement Co. v. County of San Mateo
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Mateo County and from an order refusing a new trial. Geo. H. Buck, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The plaintiffs’ action is a suit in equity to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance passed by the board of supervisors of San Mateo County. The members of the board are joined as defendants. An answer was filed and the ease came on for trial. The defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings, and the parties stipulated that the ease should be submitted upon the pleadings, leaving the court to decide for either party as it should deem proper under the law and upon the facts stated. The defendants’ motion was denied and judgment was given for plaintiffs, from which the defendants appeal.
There…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Davis & Farnum Manufacturing Co. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Carney v. SimmondsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- McKay Jewelers, Inc. v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Bueneman v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- City of Pasadena v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.