Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Quong Wo

California Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1911No. Crim. No. 1690PublishedCited by 55 opinions

APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

By ordinance No. 19,500 (New Series), adopted by the city council on December 28, 1909, and approved by the mayor December 30,. 1909, seven “Industrial Districts” numbered from 1 to 7 respectively, were established in the city of Los Angeles. By ordinance No. 19,563 (New Series), approved January 10, 1910, all of the city of Los Angeles except those portions of the said city included within the boundaries of such industrial districts and such fire districts as are now or may be hereafter established and designated as such by ordinance, and also excepting that portion of the said city lying…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Caminetti v. Pac. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1920

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API