Ex parte Lacey
California Supreme Court
corpus, to secure a discharge from a judgment of imprisonment of the Police Court of the City of Los Angeles. Court upon a writ of habeas The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGa-ROUtte, J.
The petitioner has been convicted and imprisoned for violating a city ordinance of the city of Los Angeles, which provides: “No person or persons shall establish or conduct any steam shoddy machine, or steam carpet-beating machine, within one hundred feet of any church, schoolhouse, residence, or dwelling-house.” He now alleges the judgment void upon the ground that the ordinance is void, and seeks his release by writ of habeas corpus. He claims the ordinance void upon the ground that it interferes with certain of his inalienable rights vouchsafed to him by the constitution. Upon the part of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Application of JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Ex parte ShraderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Johnson v. SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by37 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Odd Fellows' Cemetery Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Ex Parte HadacheckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Bellerive Investment Co. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.